What we checked.
What remains unknown.

7-One Properties visible-catalogue reconciliation — 4 November 2026

7-One’s official Ongoing category ↗ and Handover category ↗ expose 17 unique named references: two Ongoing and 15 Handover. All 17 were added, bringing GHOR·SCOPE to 3,280 development references across 956 known-source profiles; 62 profiles now carry project records. Every row remains a catalogue or historical reference rather than a confirmed available sale unit. Review the 7-One records and evidence limits.

Seven official URLs were enumerated: homepage, About, both functioning project categories, Contact, the site membership page and REHAB member identity ↗. The source exposes no project detail pages, public brochure, floor plan, unit layout, project-specific facilities, current numeric price, dated live-unit list, handover date, project video, 3D/360 tour, independent buyer review or project-specific approval/title/structural certificate. Thirteen distinct category-row visuals were mapped and labelled as render/photo not identified by the source. One generic image reused by four named rows, plus logos, was excluded.

The unresolved source conflicts remain visible. The homepage claims 60+ projects and says 60 were handed over, leaving at least 43 names absent from the two exposed categories. “Upcoming Projects” points only to a # placeholder. Visible names “Khan Primros” and “Swamolota” differ from their assigned asset filenames “Khan Primrose” and “Swarnalata.” The website says the real-estate concern has operated since 1998 and separately says the group began in 2001, while REHAB gives 2004 as the company inception date. The site’s Jagannathpur/Bashundhara contact details and REHAB’s Dhanmondi contact details are both retained as company-level routes; none is assigned to a project.

7 One Land Developments Ltd. and its Neelachal Abashon project remain a separate company/portfolio and were not merged into 7-One Properties. A third-party One Nahar Garden advertisement conflicts internally between Ready and Under Construction and was not imported as developer status, price or stock. The bounded Meta Ad Library keyword query ↗ returned more than 50,000 broad unrelated matches; no company-attributable paid ad was verified and no absence claim is made. No stable official social channel was established, so ordinary-post evidence is not inferred. Khulna JH Properties remained a REHAB-only regional lead without an enumerable official catalogue, and Edison Properties’ dynamic catalogue remained unchanged.

Amin Mohammad Lands complete-catalogue reconciliation — 3 November 2026

AMLDL’s complete exposed official catalogue ↗ contains seven unique land-project references with no pagination or status categories. Six existing records were refreshed and Amin Mohammad Town was added, bringing GHOR·SCOPE to 3,263 development references across 956 known-source profiles; 61 profiles carry project records. All seven remain catalogue references with status, numeric price and dated live units unverified. Review the AMLDL records and evidence limits.

Fifteen official URLs were enumerated: the homepage, complete catalogue, all seven exact project pages, gallery index, three exact historical gallery pages, contact page and REHAB member identity ↗. Exact pages contribute 43 source-labelled facts and 51 attributed facility claims. Media review maps 14 exact-page visuals, seven historical event photographs, five direct public brochures and seven official-gallery videos. Each exact-page visual remains labelled render/photo not identified by source. Brochures receive brochure credit only; no direct-plan credit was inferred from a brochure, “layout plan” wording or the word “plantation.” SVG benefit icons, logos, shared regulation backgrounds, responsive duplicates and related assets were excluded.

The source conflicts remain visible. Ashulia Model Town’s specification block names Uttara View, and Uttara View reuses Ashulia’s media folder and much of the same copy. Green Banasree’s expected 2025 implementation target has passed without a published outcome. Amin Mohammad City’s AMLDL-owned page says the project was linked to Amin Mohammad Engineering Associates Ltd.; the two legal entities remain separate. Developer RAJUK/layout, registration, handover, allotment and availability claims are attributed company statements—not independent approval, legal, structural or live-stock evidence.

The bounded public Meta Ad Library query ↗ returned no matching all-status Bangladesh ads for the company phrase on 3 November; that result does not prove historical absence. Recent LinkedIn company posts remain ordinary marketing content, not paid ads or current stock. Three dated Green Model Town resale advertisements were reviewed as third-party seller evidence and were not imported as developer price or inventory. The complete exposed AMLDL catalogue is closed, but company history, realised condition, live sale inventory and the national source universe remain unresolved. Mohona Housing’s existing complete six-card Rangpur reconciliation remained the current regional checkpoint; no duplicate regional record was added, and unchanged blocked dynamic sources were not retried.

3D Homes official-portfolio reconciliation — 31 October 2026

3D Homes Ltd.’s official all-project catalogue ↗, all three publicly exposed status filters and every exact detail link were reconciled. The catalogue exposes 24 detail links: 20 named unique projects after consolidating duplicate-page pairs for 3D Mayakanon and 3D Prime Rose, plus two unnamed Upcoming placeholders that remain in the source ledger but are excluded from inventory. Twenty source-backed records bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,260 development references across 956 known-source company profiles; 61 profiles now have at least one project. Review the 3D Homes records and evidence limits.

The exact pages contribute 74 source-labelled facts, five project-specific facility claims for 3D Noor Empire, 40 developer-hosted same-project visuals and 32 direct assets from explicitly labelled Layout Plan sections across nine projects. Visuals are labelled render/photo not determined; responsive variants, related-project cards, logos, icons and atmospheric material were excluded. A same-project portal listing links one 3D Dew Drop video, but uploader ownership, date and current condition remain unverified. No public brochure, verified 3D/360 tour, current numeric price, dated live-unit count, project-assigned salesperson, independent project review or project-specific approval/title/structural certificate was established.

The source is internally inconsistent. Thirteen projects in the Ongoing filter have exact pages that say Completed; four exact pages that say Ongoing are missing from that filter. The Ready and Upcoming filters are empty even though exact pages label 3D Shapla and two unnamed placeholders Upcoming. Duplicate Mayakanon pages say Upcoming and Ongoing, while duplicate Prime Rose pages say Completed and Ongoing. 3D Shapla adds one explicit Rangpur reference without inferring a sale unit. Undated BDHousing advertisements for 3D Dew Drop and 3D Toruchaya publish July 2023 and May 2018 handovers that conflict with the current official Ongoing pages; the Noor Empire portal card says Sale / Call for Price but publishes no numeric price, source date or unit count. All remain labelled portal advertisements with paid-placement status unknown, not verified inventory.

REHAB identifies 3D Homes Ltd. ↗ as a Private Limited company, member 1797/2025, and the legal profile remains separate from similarly named developers. Facebook and LinkedIn links come from the official site and are labelled ordinary social channels. The public Meta Ad Library keyword query returned roughly 14,000 noisy matches; no attributable 3D Homes advertiser card was established in the inspected scope, so no paid ad is credited and no absence claim is made. A bounded authority search established no project-specific notice. Comilla Holdings’ catalogue still resets the public connection and was not reconstructed from an older cache; Edison Properties’ unchanged dynamic-catalogue blocker was not retried.

Twilight Builders Dhaka–Rangpur portfolio reconciliation — 30 October 2026

Twilight Builders Ltd.’s official portfolio ↗ and its current and legacy category views expose 13 distinct names: 12 exact project pages plus the archive-only Twilight Bondhon Tower card. Six current references are Upcoming/Ongoing and seven are Sold Out/Completed historical references. Thirteen new records and one regional company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,240 development references across 956 known-source company profiles; 60 profiles have at least one project record. Review the Twilight Builders records and evidence limits.

The 12 exact pages contribute 163 source-labelled facts, 252 templated developer facility claims and 27 visually reviewed, same-project architectural renders. No image is presented as a construction photograph. Related-project carousels, icons, logos and atmospheric visuals were excluded. No direct floor plan, public brochure, project video, verified 3D/360 tour, current price, dated live-unit count, project-assigned salesperson, independent project review or project-specific approval/title/structural certificate was established. Image volume does not change scoring.

The live source remains internally inconsistent. The legacy Upcoming view ↗ includes Olympia, while its exact page and current taxonomy say Sold Out. The legacy Sold Out page is empty even though Victoria, Olympia and Elysium exact pages say Sold Out. All Project omits newer Arenova and archive-only Bondhon Tower, misspells Alaska as “Alasaka,” calls Olivia “Olivia Tower,” and links Paradise’s card to Victoria. Bondhon remains a stale archive reference without a usable exact page, not current inventory.

Bluebell and Olivia are labelled Completed while publishing future December 2026 handover dates at this check. Tower’s location varies between Ershad Mor and Grand Hotel More, and Olympia/Elysium retain malformed source fields. Both claims or spellings remain visible; none is silently certified or inferred. The repeated 21-item PREMIUM FEATURES template—including “Fire Safety System”—is attributed developer copy, not evidence of provision, approval or legal/structural safety.

The official Our Story page ↗ says the company was founded in 2022, while an attributable LinkedIn company page ↗ says 2020 and references an older domain; neither is treated as a registration record. The official footer’s social controls resolve to #, so the LinkedIn page is not called official-site-linked. A historical Victoria LinkedIn booking post remains ordinary social evidence, not paid or current-stock evidence. Meta Ad Library was blocked/disabled in the available public research interface, so no paid ad was attributed. Bounded REHAB, resale and authority checks established no exact match; those checks are not exhaustive.

The personal-details “Get Project Details” gate was not submitted and received no brochure or plan credit. Edison Properties’ unchanged dynamic-catalogue blocker was not retried.

Rajshahi Property exposed-catalogue reconciliation — 29 October 2026

Rajshahi Property’s live official website ↗ exposes four ongoing projects—NS Palace, Aam Chattar Tower, Kabir Manzil and Bhadra Tower—and three completed references—Janani Tower, Ismat Tower and Green Tower. All seven exact pages were reconciled, adding seven Rajshahi development references and one regional company-brand profile. GHOR·SCOPE now indexes 3,227 development references across 955 known-source company profiles; 59 profiles have at least one project record. Review the Rajshahi Property records and evidence limits.

The exact pages contribute 80 source-labelled facts and 35 developer-claimed facility entries. NS Palace contributes three visually reviewed, developer-hosted furnished 3D layout plans; they are not dimensioned architectural drawings or realised-project photographs. No other project exposed usable same-project media in its exact-page body. No current price, dated live-unit count, handover date, named project salesperson, public brochure, project video, 3D/360 tour, independent project review or project-specific approval/title/safety certificate was established.

The homepage says “5+” completed projects while the homepage and finished-project page ↗ expose only three names, leaving at least two historical completed names unresolved. The exposed catalogue is reconciled, but the historical portfolio is not closed. The same homepage also says both 13 years of success and 15+ years of experience; neither is treated as a registration date.

Ismat Tower’s category card says G+8 floors, while its exact narrative says 14 storeys; the published Bhadra address conflicts with narrative copy placing it at Aam Chattar, and the page describes commercial/office use while retaining a flat-size template field. NS Palace and Ismat Tower use mismatched old URL slugs, while Green Tower uses the opaque /fgf/ slug. Visible project titles and category-card identity are retained, and these stale-link or factual conflicts remain explicit rather than being normalized away.

A dated NS Palace news post ↗ names Betterment Bangladesh Limited leadership at the October 2025 launch event but does not explain that company’s legal relationship to the Rajshahi Property brand or project ownership; they remain separate. Seven generic English template testimonials were excluded from reviews and scoring. A public Meta Ad Library keyword query returned about 13 broad matches but no attributable Rajshahi Property advertiser card. The official-site-linked Facebook page remains ordinary social presence, not paid-ad evidence. Bounded exact-name checks established no exact REHAB match, attributable resale listing or public-authority notice.

Tricon Properties’ live homepage and project-category pages displayed no project cards even though older indexed pages list seven names. That source remains blocked/inconsistent and was not imported or marked complete. Edison Properties’ unchanged dynamic-catalogue blocker was not retried.

Perk Bangla Barishal portfolio reconciliation — 28 October 2026

Perk Bangla Limited’s official catalogue ↗ explicitly describes its complete portfolio and exposes four records: Perk Point Residences as Ongoing / Now Selling, plus River View Tower, Perk Center and Perk Esshan Tower as Upcoming. All four exact pages were reconciled, adding four Barishal development references and one non-REHAB company profile. GHOR·SCOPE now indexes 3,220 development references across 954 known-source company profiles; 58 profiles have at least one project record. Review the Perk Bangla portfolio and evidence limits.

The exact pages contribute 41 source-labelled facts, 24 developer-claimed facility entries and ten visually reviewed, same-project architectural renders. No image is presented as a construction photograph. No direct floor plan, public brochure, working project video, 3D/360 tour, current price, dated live-unit count, handover date, named project salesperson, independent project review or project-specific approval/title/safety certificate was established. Image volume does not change scoring.

Perk Point’s homepage summary says nine storeys and 33 apartments while the homepage copy, catalogue and exact page say ten storeys and 35 apartments; the exact-page values are retained with the disagreement visible. Perk Center’s residential wording conflicts with its commercial-podium gallery, while Perk Esshan Tower is also called Perk Ishan Lake City and its gallery describes retail podium levels. These aliases and type conflicts remain explicit rather than being normalized away.

River View Tower ↗ gates its floor-plan brochure behind an enquiry/registration flow; no personal details were submitted and no direct-plan credit was awarded. Perk Esshan’s “VIEW FLOOR PLAN” is plain text without a public plan destination, and “360-degree city views” describes a view rather than an interactive tour. Perk Point’s undated “Now Selling” wording is retained as a company claim, not live stock.

Meta Ad Library’s exact Bangladesh keyword query ↗ displayed no matching ads; advertiser and spelling variants remain unresolved. Bounded exact-name checks did not establish an official social profile, attributable resale listing, public-authority notice or exact REHAB match. Those negative checks are not exhaustive and do not establish legal or regulatory status. Edison Properties’ unchanged dynamic-catalogue blocker was not retried.

Comilla developer identity and catalogue reconciliation — 27 October 2026

Comilla Developments & Holdings Ltd.’s current homepage ↗ exposes eight project cards but only six unique names: two cards each for CHL Lavender and CHL Lake Shore were consolidated. All six remain source-labelled “On Going”; that category is historical catalogue evidence, not proof that a unit is currently for sale. Six source-backed references bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,216 development records while the reconciled company registry remains at 953 profiles. Review the Comilla Developments portfolio and evidence limits.

The six project records contribute 12 source-labelled facts and six visually reviewed same-project architectural renders. No project page, floor plan, brochure, price, dated availability, handover date, project-assigned salesperson, project-specific approval or safety disclosure, 3D/360 tour or independent project review was established. The source does not publish a project location, so none inherits Cumilla or Dhaka from the company name or Uttara office.

The dedicated Projects page ↗ currently exposes repeated, unlabeled renders and placeholder copy beneath All, Completed, Ongoing and Upcoming controls. Those controls cannot be mapped safely to project names, and the page therefore does not enumerate a complete portfolio. The homepage says the company began in 2002 while still displaying “19 years experience”; that stale arithmetic remains a company-claim conflict rather than a corrected founding date.

REHAB profile 2732 identifies Comilla Developments & Holdings Ltd. separately from REHAB profile 1990, Comilla Holdings Ltd. A search-visible 18-name catalogue for the second company ↗ overlaps four names—CHL Dreams Park, CHL Marigold, CHL Lavender and CHL Lake Shore—but its live Projects and Contact pages could not be retrieved. The two legal profiles remain separate, the overlap is preserved as an unresolved ownership conflict, and zero projects were imported for profile 1990.

An exact Bangladesh Meta Ad Library query surfaced one result from unrelated Asset Developments & Holdings Ltd.; it is excluded rather than attributed to either Comilla company. Targeted social, resale and authority searches established no attributable project evidence. Edison Properties’ unchanged dynamic-catalogue blocker was not retried.

Dreamland Sylhet portfolio reconciliation — 26 October 2026

Dreamland Property Developer’s complete exposed official catalogue was reconciled across 14 first-party URLs: homepage, catalogue, About, Contact and all ten exact project pages. The interactive catalogue exposes six Previous, two Present and two Upcoming records. Ten source-backed projects and one non-REHAB company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,210 development references and 953 profiles. Review the Dreamland portfolio and evidence limits.

The exact pages contribute 51 source-labelled facts, 17 developer-claimed facilities, ten visually reviewed architectural renders, 29 direct plan images, eight ungated brochure PDFs and two project videos. Completed references remain labelled with renders rather than photographs. Empty floor-plan/brochure targets, self-referential video placeholders, logos and unrelated material were excluded; no media volume changed scoring and no video was called a 3D/360 tour.

The official catalogue ↗ classifies ASHARA and Daud Villa as Upcoming while both exact pages say Ongoing. AZHAR HOME and OSRAH HOME publish conflicting size values. Several pages expose malformed size strings or the invalid date “November -0001”; numeric bounds are normalized only where the source supplies them, and invalid dates are excluded. Catalogue presence and Ongoing status do not establish a unit for sale; no dated price or live-unit count was imported.

The official site varies the company wording among Developer, Development and Developers; aliases are retained without creating duplicate entities. Its contact page publishes Mirer Moydan, while two third-party directories publish East Shahi Eidgah and conflicting company-review snapshots of 4.4 from one review versus 4.3 from 10+ external reviews. Both remain low-weight company context, not project evidence. An undated BDhousing “ASAR HOME” listing cannot be confidently matched to official ASHARA or AZHAR HOME and was not imported.

Meta Ad Library’s exact Bangladesh keyword query ↗ displayed no matching ads; advertiser and spelling variants remain unresolved. The official AZHAR handover video and ANAQA construction post are labelled ordinary social posts, not paid ads or current-stock evidence. REHAB displayed 926 members ↗ and no exact Dreamland match was established. Targeted Sylhet City Corporation and Bangladesh government-domain searches returned no exact company result; absence is not approval, compliance or legal-status evidence.

Nandan Khulna portfolio reconciliation — 25 October 2026

Nandan Design & Development Ltd.’s complete exposed named web catalogue was reconciled across 13 official URLs: five current project cards and eight completed success-story pages, plus the supporting company pages. Thirteen source-backed records and one company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,200 development references and 952 profiles. Review the Nandan portfolio and evidence limits.

The exact sources contribute 58 source-labelled facts, ten facility claims, six project photographs and six architectural renders. Two Odoo placeholder images, one promotional panel, an ambiguous collage and duplicate assets were excluded. No image volume changed scoring, and no direct plan, brochure or 3D/360-tour credit was awarded.

The About page ↗ says ten projects were completed by December 2024, while the public completed archive ↗ names eight and Diganto’s page calls its February 2025 handover the tenth completion. The two unnamed references remain unresolved. Nayabad’s HTML title says Nishorgo while its visible heading and body say Nayabad; that conflict is preserved. Godhuli, Zafrin and Prantor do not inherit Khulna from the company office because their exact cards do not state a city.

The current-project page ↗ says 1,430 sq ft Sharnali flats are available, but the statement is undated and supplies no live-unit count or price. A Facebook post dated 6 July 2024 is retained as ordinary social evidence, not paid-ad or current-stock proof. Meta Ad Library returned about 2,500 noisy keyword matches; the inspected leading cards were unrelated, so no Nandan-attributable paid ad was established. No exact REHAB match or Nandan-specific KDA notice was established. Bikroy’s Khulna sale page ↗ displayed 42 sale results while its price-trend panel cited 57 ads; neither aggregate was imported.

Sarna Kutir Cumilla portfolio and legal-entity reconciliation — 24 October 2026

Sarna Kutir’s complete publicly exposed official catalogue was reconciled across 19 first-party URLs: the four status views, all 11 exact project pages, homepage, About, Membership and Contact. The unique union contains 11 Cumilla developments—seven Ongoing, no Upcoming and four Completed/Sold Out historical references. Eleven new records plus one brand and two separately incorporated legal profiles bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,187 development references and 951 company profiles. Review the Sarna Kutir portfolio and source conflicts.

The pages contribute 53 source-labelled facts, four plan-derived facility claims, 11 project-matched catalogue renders and seven direct J.S Majumder Home plan images. The renders are labelled as developer artwork, not construction photographs. Another 104 detail-gallery images remain uncredited pending project-by-project visual classification. Every “Download Brochure” control self-links to its project page, so no direct or gated brochure credit is awarded.

Seven partial or inconsistent unit tables expose 409 rows and 122 undated “Available” labels. They are preserved as developer claims, not converted into live-unit counts. Sarna Kutir Tower publishes nine units per floor while the table shows A–H; Bhuyian Heritage and Zaman Zahanara expose incomplete floor/unit sequences; Zaman Zahanara varies Flat M between 1,425 and 1,507 sq ft; Mesco Ali contains malformed sizes, a duplicate row and missing combinations. Completed references remain historical catalogue records, not current stock.

The official header and Membership page ↗ co-brand Sarna Kutir Properties (Pvt.) Ltd. and Sarna Kutir Developers (Pvt.) Ltd. and publish separate incorporation certificates, but no project page assigns either legal entity. Projects therefore remain brand-attributed while both legal profiles stay separate; the documents are published evidence, not GHOR·SCOPE legal certification. REHAB displayed 926 members ↗ and no exact legal-name match was established.

Meta Ad Library ↗ returned no matching active ad for the brand query. Search-visible ordinary pages use conflicting Sarna Kutir/Shovo branding and mention additional names such as Upolota Tower and Dhupachaya; none was imported without ownership reconciliation. No verified current price, dated inventory, handover date, project-assigned salesperson, project-specific approval/safety certification, 3D/360 tour or independent project review was established.

Barendra Properties regional portfolio reconciliation — 23 October 2026

Barendra Properties Ltd.’s complete publicly exposed Rajshahi portfolio was reconciled across its official catalogue, sale archive and five valid exact sale-unit pages. The source names four developments: Barendra Prothoma Tower, Barendra Anam’s Home and Barendra Cayabithi Tower as Running, plus Barendra Nigar Tower as Completed. Four new records and one separately sourced company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,176 development references and 948 company profiles. Review the Barendra portfolio and source conflicts.

Five dated sale-unit pages were consolidated into the matching Prothoma and Anam’s projects rather than counted as separate developments. The exact sources contribute 21 building facts, two project-matched architectural renders and six direct plan images. A sixth sale-archive row is an unrelated Miami luxury-villa template listing and was excluded, together with copied US addresses, placeholder copy, an unrelated Dubai video, generic interiors, broken images and an unattributable review.

The 29 December 2025 unit pages publish historical developer-marketing totals for Prothoma Types A/B/C and Anam’s Types A/B. Those figures are not presented as current prices, and no live-unit availability is inferred. Prothoma’s ordinary Facebook promotion maps Type A/B sizes differently from the exact pages, while two pages label a Tk 5,500 multiplication rate “/mo” even though the totals behave like a per-square-foot calculation; the malformed rate labels were excluded. Anam’s/Anams and Nigar/Niger spelling conflicts remain visible.

No exact REHAB member match, project-assigned salesperson, independent project review, project-specific approval or safety disclosure, verified current price, dated availability or attributable paid Meta advertisement was established. Company contacts remain company-level. Retrieved social results are labelled ordinary posts; direct Facebook access was throttled and Instagram history remains incomplete.

Unity Builders category and source-integrity reconciliation — 22 October 2026

Unity Builders Limited’s complete visible project categories were reconciled from 17 official URLs. The source exposes 24 rows—six Ongoing, three Upcoming and 15 Completed—consolidated to 23 unique project references because Unity South View appears in both Ongoing and Completed. Twenty-three new records and one separately sourced company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,172 development references and 947 company profiles. Review the Unity portfolio and source conflicts.

The project pages contribute 101 source-labelled facts, 22 developer facility claims and 18 uniquely mapped official catalogue visuals. Three pairs of named rows reuse the same image URLs, so all six ambiguous row mappings were excluded. No asset is classified as a floor plan; no direct plan, brochure or project tour was exposed. Two Upcoming records—Unity Plaza and Unity Residence—explicitly advance Barishal coverage.

Conflicts remain visible. Unity South View is both Ongoing and Completed and is published as G+7 versus G+9. The homepage says Unity Banalata while the catalogue says Unity Bonolota. Hotel Royal Pacific is G+15 in the catalogue/specification block but G+20 (21 floors) in its introduction. Unity Sunflower says both 90% and 85% construction progress. Undated “Live Unit Status” panels label two Sunflower units and four Lake View units Available, while the hotel page publishes several package prices; all remain unverified developer claims rather than dated current inventory or independently confirmed prices.

The official sitemap ↗ contains hundreds of unrelated /items/Z… URLs dated 21 October 2026. They were excluded as sitemap pollution/source-integrity risk; the visible project categories are reconciled, but the overall domain sitemap remains unresolved. REHAB displayed 926 members ↗ and no exact Unity Builders Limited match was established. Unity Development and Technologies Ltd. and Unity Real Estate Ltd. remain separate REHAB entities.

Bikroy displayed 3,010 mixed sale results ↗; none were imported. RAJUK EPMS ↗ still showed 31 August 2026 as its newest visible notice. Meta Ad Library did not expose an attributable public Unity Builders advertiser card, and ordinary posts were not classified as paid advertising.

NGR Properties source-integrity reconciliation — 21 October 2026

NGR Properties’ complete exposed project scope was reconciled through its robots-disclosed sitemap index, complete service sitemap, archive and all three exact project pages. The source exposes exactly three names—NGR Tower, Noor Square and NGR Homes Project—with no status/category pagination. The existing three records were refreshed rather than duplicated, so GHOR·SCOPE remains at 3,149 development references and 946 company profiles. Review the NGR source conflicts.

All three pages show 20 October 2020 and contain unrelated education-admission template copy. Each also reuses the same generic overseas skyline/harbour image, which is excluded as stock/template imagery rather than credited as project media. The source publishes no project-specific address, type, unit size, layout, facilities, status, handover, approval, price or availability. Only the exact project names, URLs and source dates receive evidence credit; no current sale stock is inferred.

The site brands the business NGR Properties, while its chairman page calls the 2022 flagship enterprise “NGR Housing estate ltd.” That possible legal-company wording remains an unresolved identity conflict: a current REHAB directory ↗ search returned no NGR or NGR Housing match. The 2020 project-page dates also predate the company’s stated 2022 founding. Every footer label for Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram resolves to the chairman’s personal Facebook profile, so none is presented as a corporate channel.

REHAB remained at 926 members. Bikroy displayed 3,008 mixed sale results ↗; the volatile, non-deduplicated aggregate was not imported. RAJUK EPMS ↗ still showed 31 August 2026 as its newest visible notice. Meta Ad Library did not return a publicly retrievable NGR keyword result; no ordinary post was classified as paid advertising.

MPDL nationwide portfolio reconciliation — 20 October 2026

MIAJY Properties and Developers Limited’s complete exposed first-party catalogue was reconciled after exhausting every Load More batch, checking the public 39-record API, all four status views, all duplex, division and project-type views, and all 39 exact project URLs. The source exposes 24 upcoming, 11 ongoing, four handover and zero ready-flat references. Thirty-nine records and one separately sourced company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,149 development references and 946 company profiles. Review the MPDL portfolio and source conflicts.

The pages contribute 426 source-labelled building facts, 202 developer-claimed facility items and 39 project-matched official featured visuals. The source does not identify photograph versus render, so no visual receives a stronger label; logos, icons, related-project cards and atmospheric assets receive no credit. No direct floor plan, brochure, project video or verified 3D/360 tour was exposed.

Three Handover-category records—MPDL-KHAN VILLA, MPDL-CHOWDURY BARI and Talukdar Bari—publish future 2027 handover dates. AHAMMOD VILLA publishes “2400 Sq. Ft.” in its Building Facing field. Legacy exact-page slugs frequently differ from the live project names, and the shared catalogue field mixes price language with “builder” and “joint venture” relationship text. These conflicts and raw spellings remain visible; no current price or unit availability was inferred. MPDL-S.A VILLA’s exact URL rendered only a WordPress shell, so its catalogue/API fields remain the limited evidence scope.

The official About/schema identity is retained separately because no exact company/domain match was established in the retained REHAB baseline. REHAB displayed 926 members ↗; the changed identity was not isolated, so no profile was guessed, removed or merged. Bikroy displayed 3,109 mixed sale results ↗; none were imported. RAJUK EPMS ↗ still showed 31 August 2026 as its newest visible notice. Targeted public searches established no attributable MPDL paid ad, exact resale advertisement, named project salesperson, project-specific approval/certification or independent project-level buyer review.

Starlit–CDC entity and portfolio reconciliation — 19 October 2026

Starlit Homes Ltd.’s complete exposed canonical catalogue was reconciled across all status sections and 46 exact project pages: seven ongoing, ten upcoming and 29 completed historical references. Forty-six records bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,110 development references and 945 company profiles. Review the Starlit portfolio and source conflicts.

The 17 ongoing/upcoming exact pages contribute 228 source-labelled building facts and 17 parking claims. Thirty-eight exact-project catalogue visuals are retained with photograph-versus-render uncertainty. Eight other current-project cards use stock, mismatched, reused or source-ambiguous imagery, so those assets receive no media credit. No image is inferred to be a plan.

CDC Properties Limited remains a separate REHAB company. Its complete exposed mirror contains 43 project links—three fewer than Starlit’s canonical catalogue—and its About page names Starlit as a strategic partner. Shared management, contacts, office and portfolio material do not justify merging the legal entities. No duplicate CDC inventory was created; the complete 43-link mirror and its omissions are recorded as conflict evidence.

Starlit’s About page says 30 completed projects while the current catalogue exposes 29, leaving at least one unnamed historical reference unresolved. Seven Upcoming records also carry undated exact-page “On Sale” labels; both claims remain visible, but neither establishes unit stock. No verified current price, dated inventory, handover date, direct plan, brochure, 3D/360 tour, project-assigned salesperson, project-specific approval/safety disclosure or independent project-level buyer review was established. Perfect Living’s primary domain returned a gateway failure and its legacy domain was suspended, so no record was inferred from indexed fragments.

Rajshahi portfolio update — 17 October 2026

ANB Unique Real Estate Ltd.’s complete exposed current catalogue was reconciled across the homepage, About, Projects and Contact pages, all three status filters and all eight exact project pages. The current source exposes three ongoing, two upcoming and three completed references, all in Rajshahi. Eight projects and one company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,058 development references and 944 company profiles. Review the ANB portfolio and source conflicts.

The exact pages contribute 60 source-labelled building facts, 56 developer-claimed facilities and 44 same-project company-hosted visuals. Logos, maps, interface icons, related-project cards and placeholder or atmospheric images were excluded; no visual was classified as a floor plan. Current-versus-indexed status conflicts remain explicit for Z & Z Heights, MN Tower and Khorshed Tower. KM MAX Tower, Z & Z Heights and MN Tower remain labelled ongoing despite passed completion dates. MN Tower publishes two incompatible unit counts, while Sneha Tower publishes conflicting floor and Type-B size figures. Two company-level WhatsApp routes also conflict; neither is presented as a named or project-assigned salesperson.

The company says it has 11+ projects, while the current catalogue exposes eight named pages, leaving at least three historical references unresolved. Older indexed KM MAX TOWER -2, -3 and -4 variants remain stale evidence and were not imported. No verified current price, dated unit availability, direct plan, brochure, project tour, project-specific approval or certification, named project salesperson or independent project-level buyer review was established. Completed references remain historical catalogue evidence, not current sale inventory.

Rupayan evidence-depth update — 16 October 2026

Rupayan Housing Estate Ltd.’s already reconciled 19-project current catalogue ↗ and all 19 exact project routes were rechecked: eight ongoing, four upcoming and seven completed. The catalogue total is unchanged and remains separate from Rupayan City and Rupayan Real Estate Limited. Review the legal entity’s portfolio and evidence.

Fifteen exact pages expose 136 same-project gallery assets, and 12 expose working direct developer-hosted brochure PDFs. GHOR·SCOPE now links those files with source and check dates. Gallery assets are labelled as developer-hosted project visuals without guessing whether each is a render or photograph. Amenity icons, maps, logos, related-project cards and unlabeled at-a-glance panels were excluded; no gallery asset was reclassified as a floor plan.

The visible brochure control resolves to a self-fragment on checked pages even where the page data exposes a working PDF, so the interface defect remains flagged. North Vista, Alif Meem Tower, Century Landed and South Symphony expose no project gallery. No verified current price, dated unit availability, new handover date, project-assigned salesperson, explicitly labelled direct floor plan, 3D/360 tour or independent project-level review was established. Catalogue and completed references remain non-inventory references.

Rajbari named portfolio update — 13 October 2026

Rajbari Builders Ltd.’s named official web scope was reconciled across the homepage, About page, four status categories and 12 current exact project pages. The unique union contains 23 references: 12 current exact pages, nine handed-over category names and two homepage-gallery-only names. Twenty-three records bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,033 development references and 941 company profiles. Review the Rajbari portfolio and source conflicts.

The exact pages contribute 76 source-labelled building facts, 108 developer-claimed facilities and 57 same-project official media assets, including 45 direct plan/layout images across seven projects. Three current exact records explicitly advance Khulna coverage: RBL Krishnachura, Rajbari Aparajita and RBL Harmony Lakeside. Generic facility icons, logos and related-project cards were excluded; render/photo status, publication dates, current condition and reuse rights remain unstated.

Four records overlap official categories: Jabal E Noor appears in Ongoing and Upcoming, while Eastern Palace, Shamsi Bornaloy and Dolonchapa appear in Ongoing and Ready. Jabal E Noor also publishes conflicting land, parking and unit sizes. Krishnachura, Aparajita and Dolonchapa carry handover conflicts; Rajanigandha, Kuheli Kunjo, Yousuf's Dream and Shamsi Bornaloy carry size or address conflicts. Exact pages' zero-valued animated counters are treated as template defects because category cards publish non-zero specifications.

The homepage says 20 completed and 13 in progress, while About says 30/30+ completed and 12 underway. Only nine handed-over names are exposed, leaving at least 21 historical references unresolved. Homepage/Bengali About say established in 2009, English About says inception in 2015, and REHAB reports 2016 incorporation; these remain separate attributed claims. Handed-over and gallery-only references are not live stock. No verified current price, dated available-unit list, project-assigned salesperson, direct brochure, project-specific approval/certification or independent project-level review was established. Meta Ad Library exposed no result count or advertiser cards without a login flow, so ordinary posts were not classified as paid.

Khulna portfolio update — 12 October 2026

Sisvas Developments Limited’s complete exposed official catalogue was reconciled across the project archive, all three status views and all 16 exact project pages. The categories expose six Ongoing-category references, no Upcoming-category reference and ten Completed-category references. Sixteen Khulna records bring GHOR·SCOPE to 3,010 development references and 941 company profiles. Review the SISVAS portfolio and source conflicts.

The exact pages contribute 121 source-labelled building facts, 112 developer-claimed facilities and 14 same-project company-hosted architectural visuals. Two pages expose only generic “Upcoming” artwork, which was excluded together with logos and related-project cards. All 16 gated brochure buttons open modal workflows; no personal details were submitted, and no direct brochure or floor-plan file receives evidence credit.

Three status conflicts remain explicit: Mayakanon is in the Completed category while its exact page says ongoing; Akashleena and Jol Jochna are in the Ongoing category while their specification blocks say Upcoming. Additional conflicts include an impossible 31 September completion date, several narrative-versus-specification size ranges, Chayaharin’s Plot 415 versus Plot 305, Jahanara Garden’s Khulna address versus a Dhaka-labelled map link, and the singular footer identity versus REHAB’s plural legal identity.

Meta Ad Library returned no active Bangladesh keyword match for SISVAS Developments at the check; alternate advertiser names and inactive ads remain outside that bounded result. Search-indexed Facebook project items are ordinary posts, not paid ads. Six developer-selected owner/landowner testimonials are retained only as context because they are undated and non-independent. No verified current price, dated unit availability, project-assigned salesperson, project-specific approval/certification, direct plan, video/tour or independent project-level review dataset was established.

Barishal portfolio update — 11 October 2026

Hillview Housing Limited’s complete exposed official portfolio was reconciled across the homepage, every status category and all 15 exact project pages: nine ongoing, three upcoming and three completed historical references. Fifteen new records—13 in Barishal and two upcoming Jolshiri projects in Dhaka—bring GHOR·SCOPE to 2,994 development references and 941 company profiles. Review the Hillview portfolio and source conflicts.

The exact pages contribute 150 source-labelled building facts, 165 developer-claimed facilities and 15 same-project company-hosted architectural visuals. Each visual retains render/photo, publication-date, current-condition and reuse-rights uncertainty. Logos, related-project cards and generic artwork were excluded. No direct floor plan, brochure, video or 3D/360 tour was exposed.

Project and identity conflicts remain visible. Dr. Alauddin Tower’s official title conflicts with its Abdus Sattar URL and asset filename; Mahmuda Tower’s overview calls it Mahmuda Heights Tower. Jolshiri 01 and 02 have Dhaka addresses and category cards but templated headings say Barishal. Lakeview Tower and Hillview City publish headline size ranges that conflict with their unit tables, and several orientation or road-width strings are malformed. The footer and contact page also publish different Barishal office addresses and phones.

Meta Ad Library showed two active official sponsored cards, started 28 September and 3 October 2026. Both advertise 1500–1600 sq ft south-facing flats on Polytechnic Road but omit an exact project name, so they remain developer-level paid evidence; one unrelated result was excluded. Generic “Available” and “Flat Availability” headings expose no dated unit count. No current price, verified live stock, handover date, project-assigned salesperson, project-specific approval/certification or independent project-level buyer review was established.

Barishal Division portfolio update — 10 October 2026

Winstone Properties Ltd.’s complete exposed two-domain portfolio was reconciled. The newer official catalogue exposes 15 named cards—five ongoing, one upcoming and nine completed—consolidated to 13 unique terminal detail pages after redirects. A separate company-controlled legacy catalogue exposes 14 references. Fifteen projects and one company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 2,979 development references and 940 company profiles. Review the Winstone portfolio and source conflicts.

The exact pages contribute 83 source-labelled building facts, 50 developer-claimed facilities and 59 exact-project company-hosted visuals. Current-site assets are explicitly labelled architectural visuals rather than site photography; legacy assets retain render/photo uncertainty, while 19 Silver Sun images are source-labelled grand-opening ceremony photos. Four public HTML brochure pages are linked, but no direct floor-plan file, video or 3D/360 tour was exposed. Logos, related-project cards and repeated asset URLs were excluded.

Silver Sun Eco Resort is an ongoing share-based hospitality project in Kuakata, Patuakhali. Government registry evidence places Kuakata Municipality in Patuakhali, Barishal Division; the record advances regional coverage without relabelling it as Barishal city. Its 172 Shotok land claim, registered-deed language and benefit/profit statements remain attributed company claims—not verified title, returns or current share inventory. The company says price and released-unit/share terms are checked privately; no public price or dated stock list is inferred.

Duplicate and factual conflicts remain explicit. Winstone-7 and Winstone-10 each appear as both ongoing and completed identities, and their completed-card links redirect to the ongoing Kanan Hill and Dream Park pages. Several catalogue names differ from exact-page names. The newer and legacy domains publish the same Uttara office but conflicting phone/email sets. No exact REHAB match, reliable paid-ad result, project-assigned salesperson, project-specific approval/certification or independent buyer-review dataset was established. Retrieved LinkedIn promotions remain ordinary posts, not paid ads.

Rangpur catalogue update — 9 October 2026

Ad-din Properties & Engineering’s complete exposed catalogue was reconciled across all six exact project pages: three ongoing, two upcoming and one completed reference, all explicitly in Rangpur. Six projects and one company profile bring GHOR·SCOPE to 2,964 development references and 939 company profiles. The official site alternates between “AD-Din Properties and Engineering” and “Ad-din Properties & Engineering”; no Ltd suffix or independent legal registration was established.

The exact pages contributed 59 source-labelled building facts, six developer-claimed facility or building-service statements and ten deduplicated same-project official visuals. Every visual retains render/photo, date, present-condition and reuse-rights uncertainty. Repeated images, logos, platform icons and generic visuals were excluded. No direct floor plan, brochure, project video or 3D/360 tour was exposed.

Panorama remains Upcoming while publishing a scheduled 2025 handover; Lea Palace and Lake View remain Ongoing with the same passed target. Current handover and sale status are unverified. Lake View’s readable English block conflicts numerically with a duplicate mis-encoded legacy block, Rose Valley’s remaining specifications are unreadable mojibake, and Lea Palace’s locality changes between Radhavallab and Radhavallav. These conflicts remain visible rather than reconstructed. The catalogue does not establish current stock: no verified price, unit availability, project-assigned salesperson, project-specific approval or independent project-level buyer review was found. Generic social-platform roots were excluded, and the site’s Testimonials section presents staff biographies rather than buyer reviews. Review the Ad-din portfolio and source cautions.

REHAB’s public directory displayed 925 members ↗, down from 927 at recent checks; no company profiles were removed because the changed identities could not be isolated safely. Bikroy displayed 3,192 mixed sale results ↗; the volatile aggregate was not imported. RAJUK EPMS ↗ still showed 31 August 2026 as its newest visible notice.

Khulna catalogue update — 8 October 2026

Nandanik Design & Development Ltd.’s complete exposed catalogue was reconciled across both pagination pages and all five exact project pages. The source emits ten raw catalogue cards but repeats the same five project URLs; exact-URL consolidation leaves three ongoing and two completed references. Four projects are explicitly located in Khulna. Nandanik Edvan remains city-unassigned because the homepage carousel says Khulna while the catalogue and detail page say only Mirpur DOHS. Five new projects bring GHOR·SCOPE to 2,958 development references and 938 company profiles.

The exact pages contributed 38 source-labelled building facts, 32 developer-claimed facilities, 25 same-project official visuals, 22 direct floor-plan assets across three projects and one developer-hosted completed-project video. Media served from exact pages’ 3D-Elevation directories are labelled renders; hero assets retain render/photo uncertainty. Logos, footer artwork and generic interior concepts were excluded. Nandanik Hamid’s live page explicitly publishes an undated BDT 6,000-per-square-foot negotiable rate and says apartments are available with cash and installment options; the total price field and available-unit count remain empty because the page has no publication date or unit inventory.

The official website identity remains separate from REHAB-listed Nandanik Developers & Construction Ltd.; no legal relationship is inferred. The Contact page’s main phone and email conflict with the repeated homepage/footer and project-page contacts, and the office floor changes from third on the homepage to fourth on exact pages. Three project-matched Facebook items are retained as dated ordinary posts, not paid ads or fresh inventory. The site’s 10+ project claim leaves at least five unnamed historical references unresolved. Generic FAQ claims about BNBC, materials, audits and approvals receive no project-specific approval or certification credit. Review the Nandanik portfolio and source cautions.

Rajshahi inventory update — 7 October 2026

Al-Aksha Developers’ complete exposed catalogue was reconciled across its Ongoing, Upcoming and Completed views and all 18 exact project pages. The current source exposes seven ongoing projects, one upcoming project and ten completed historical references. Repeated homepage-carousel cards were consolidated by exact project URL. All 18 records are newly added, bringing GHOR·SCOPE to 2,953 development references and 937 company profiles.

The exact pages contributed 84 source-labelled building facts, 119 developer-claimed facility or building-service statements, 18 same-project official visuals and 30 direct plan/layout assets across 14 projects. Logos, icons and related-project cards were excluded. The assets remain developer-hosted material with unstated reuse rights and render/photo uncertainty; none is independent inspection evidence. Catalogue classification is not treated as current unit availability.

Four material conflicts or access limits remain visible: Al-Aksha Matrichaya says “9 Storied (G+09)”; the homepage/contact mobile differs from catalogue/detail footers; Kanchon Tower is officially Completed while an undated portal page says Ongoing and Tk 3,700/sft; and South Breeze’s exact page returned a WordPress critical error. No current price, verified unit availability, dated handover target, project-assigned salesperson, brochure, 3D/360 tour or independent project-level review dataset was established. Company-hosted testimonials remain attributed rather than scored as independent reviews. Review the Al-Aksha portfolio and source cautions.

Regional inventory update — 6 October 2026

Shovo Developers’ complete exposed Cumilla catalogue was reconciled across the live All, Upcoming, Ongoing and Completed views and all 14 exact project pages. The current source exposes 11 ongoing projects, three completed references and no upcoming record. All 14 are newly added, bringing GHOR·SCOPE to 2,935 development references and 936 company profiles.

The exact pages expose 488 unit-table rows. Thirty-one rows carry an undated developer “Available” label, including residential and commercial rows, but the source publishes no update dates; these labels are attributed and are not independently verified present stock. Bismillah Tower, ET Lab Upolota Tower and Badhan Cottage conflict internally: each catalogue card says Available while every published residential row says Sold Out. Ababil Shuvona Palace also says six units per floor on the catalogue card but exposes four unit rows per residential floor. No current price or availability has been inferred.

Fourteen same-project catalogue images are linked with render/photo and reuse-rights uncertainty. No direct floor plan, brochure, 3D/360 tour, project-assigned salesperson or independent project-level review was established. The official catalogue and contact page use “Shovo Developers (Pvt.) Ltd.” while the chairman biography says “Shovo Properties & Developers (Pvt.) Ltd.”; that legal-name relationship remains unresolved. The Memberships page displays remote placeholder certificate images, so it receives no membership or certification credit. Review the Shovo portfolio and source cautions.

Inventory and evidence update — 30 September 2026

Bay Developments Ltd.’s complete exposed scope was reconciled across its Residential, Commercial, Retail and Design Consultancy catalogues and all 50 unique exact detail pages. The sale portfolio contains 45 projects: 34 residential, eight commercial and three retail—five ongoing, three upcoming and 37 completed historical references. Eleven projects were added and 34 were refreshed, bringing GHOR·SCOPE to 2,512 development references.

The detail pages contributed 335 source-labelled building facts, 172 developer-claimed facilities, 353 same-project official visuals and 22 direct images from explicitly labelled Floor Plan sections across eight projects. The five Design Consultancy/client references remain in the research ledger only and are excluded from sale discovery. Catalogue presence and completed labels do not establish current stock.

Four project pages retain visible conflicts: Gemini publishes 2025 and 2026 completion years; Clearwater publishes two launch years, remains Ongoing despite a 2025 completion year and carries a no-booking-until-RAJUK-approval notice; Arvia mixes dated and TBD claims; and Edge Gallery repeats Seleste residential copy on a Retail page. A staging Hostinger email and Envato template link were excluded from company contacts and evidence credit. Meta Ad Library ↗ showed no active keyword match at the check; alternate names and inactive ads remain outside that result. No current price, exact live-unit list, named project salesperson, independent project-level review or verified 3D/360 tour was established. Read scoring method 3.0 and its uncertainty deductions.

Previous inventory update — 29 September 2026

Amin Mohammad Foundation Ltd.’s complete exposed catalogue was reconciled across 18 public category pages and all 153 exact project-detail URLs. Two same-name pairs were consolidated, leaving 151 records: 23 ongoing records after consolidation, five upcoming and 123 completed historical references. This added 145 developments and refreshed six, bringing GHOR·SCOPE to 2,501 development references.

The detail pages contributed 1,440 source-labelled building facts, 255 facility claims and 276 same-project official visuals. No direct plan, brochure or verified 3D/360 tour was exposed. Official visuals remain attributed developer material; render/photo status, date, current condition and reuse rights are unverified.

Public Meta Ad Library results exposed approximately 19 active keyword matches; 17 visible cards were reviewed. Fifteen official Foundation project ads were safely mapped as paid ads. One co-branded land ad remained entity-separated and one unrelated result was excluded. Green Sanctuary’s catalogue says Ongoing while a paid ad started 10 September advertises a ready 2,902 sq ft apartment for sale. Green Spectra’s duplicate residential/commercial pages and paid ads mix ready and under-construction wording. Eureka Tower and Green Mohakhali also publish different size ranges between detail pages and paid ads. These conflicts are shown; exact live stock and prices remain unconfirmed.

REHAB remained at 927 members ↗. Bikroy showed 3,728 mixed sale results ↗; none were imported. RAJUK EPMS ↗ still showed 31 August 2026 as its newest visible e-advertisement. No current developer price, exact live-unit list, dated handover, named project salesperson, direct design material or independently attributable project review was established.

Previous inventory update — 28 September 2026

DOM-INNO’s complete exposed catalogue was reconciled across all 27 public pages: 270 raw cards were consolidated to 256 project references. Fourteen duplicate or spelling-variant groups remain visible in the source ledger. This added 255 records and refreshed DOM-INNO Terreno, bringing GHOR·SCOPE to 2,356 development references.

The cards contributed 781 source-labelled building facts and 265 same-project official visuals. These are attributed developer materials; render/photo status, date, present condition and reuse rights remain unverified. No direct plan, brochure or working 3D/360 tour was established.

Official conflicts are retained rather than guessed: Octavia appears as ongoing and completed; Amorex has conflicting statuses, addresses, sizes and detail URLs; Citadel is tagged completed and upcoming; and Unavida publishes “1455 Katha” in its size field. DOM-INNO’s About page claims 253 handed-over, 52 ongoing and eight upcoming projects, while separately stating 250+ completed; those figures do not reconcile to the exposed catalogue. No current price, live unit, dated handover, named project salesperson, independent project-level review or independently verified approval/safety record was established.

Previous inventory update — 27 September 2026

Rupayan City’s complete exposed brand-site scope was reconciled to seven official development references: the Uttara parent, five linked Uttara components and Rupayan NSS City. Six records were added and one refreshed. Eight explicit direct plan assets and one public brochure were retained; every project status remained not stated.

Previous inventory update — 26 September 2026

Edison Properties Ltd.’s indexed official scope contains 22 unique names. Twenty-one residential/commercial records were published: eight indexed ongoing, eight indexed completed and five whose status is not stated. The live catalogue still stalls on “Loading projects,” the 25+ project claim leaves at least three names unresolved, and indexed categories may be stale.

Nine records were added and 12 refreshed. The YILI Bangladesh industrial/client reference remains research-only. The earlier EDISON ANNANYA mapping to the ANIKA HEIGHTS detail URL was removed; EDISON PRIME and LAVENDER remain visible cross-entity conflicts with the legally separate Edison Real Estate Ltd.

Previous inventory update — 25 September 2026

Rupayan Housing Estate Ltd.’s complete exposed current catalogue was reconciled to 19 projects: eight ongoing, four upcoming and seven completed. All 19 were new to this legal entity’s portfolio. Rupayan Housing Estate Ltd., Rupayan City and Rupayan Real Estate Limited remain separate identities.

The exact official project routes contributed 122 source-labelled building facts, 75 developer-claimed facilities and 17 non-placeholder official catalogue visuals. Two transparent placeholder images were excluded. Source price values of zero were treated as empty/default fields, not offers.

Previous inventory update — 24 September 2026

Sanmar Properties Ltd.’s full public catalogue was reconciled after exhausting every Load More batch: 89 raw cards consolidated to 83 named project records. Thirty-nine missing records were added and 44 existing records refreshed. Six duplicate-name pairs were merged while preserving every raw card and image URL.

Sanmar’s apparent status control exposed commercial subtypes rather than construction stages, and a direct status-filter query returned no records. Every Sanmar status remains “Not stated.” Catalogue presence is not treated as current unit availability.

Previous inventory update — 23 September 2026

Concord’s current official catalogue was reconciled across every exposed page: 46 ongoing and 14 upcoming projects. Forty-one missing records were added and 19 existing records refreshed. Five current cards are in Chattogram localities.

All 60 exact project pages were checked, contributing 448 building facts, 584 developer-claimed facilities and 702 project-scoped official visual links. Concord Hoque View was corrected to Ongoing. Concord MB Tower remains an explicit conflict between the current catalogue and an ordinary official handover post dated 23 May 2025; neither source proves current availability.

Previous inventory update — 22 September 2026

Epic Properties Ltd.’s current official catalogue is reconciled to all 18 cards exposed after two Load More interactions: 12 ongoing, two upcoming and four completed. Ten missing projects were added and eight existing records were refreshed. The cards identify 16 residential and two commercial projects; exact pages identify Epic Ferdous Windsor and Epic Plaza as mixed-use, so those source conflicts remain visible.

All 18 exact project pages were checked, contributing 101 building facts, 67 facility claims and 69 project-specific official visual links. No direct floor plan, brochure, project-specific video or verified 3D/360 tour was exposed. Linked visuals may be renders, staged images or photographs; reuse rights, publication dates and present condition are unverified.

Epic Lotus Dale was corrected from the earlier partial record’s Ongoing status to Upcoming, matching the fully expanded current catalogue. Current prices, unit availability, dated handover targets, project-assigned salespeople and independent project-level reviews remain unverified. A source-check date does not establish source freshness or live inventory.

Previous inventory update — 21 September 2026

Finlay Properties Limited is reconciled across all four currently exposed official catalogue categories: 12 ongoing, five upcoming, 17 completed and 17 contractual references. The 34 property portfolio records appear in discovery; contractual construction and client references remain in the research ledger because the source does not establish them as Finlay-developed sale inventory.

All 12 linked ongoing detail pages were checked. They contribute 96 published building facts and direct project-specific gallery, layout, brochure and approval-document links. Five catalogue images whose filenames indicate logo assets are not credited as project visuals. Current prices, unit availability, project-assigned salespeople and independent project-level buyer reviews remain unverified.

The current catalogue holds 12,200 project-attributed image links across 2,240 developments. They may be renders, staged images or photographs; links do not prove image rights or present condition. Developer-hosted approval files remain disclosures, not legal or structural certification.

Previous inventory update — 20 September 2026

Added 159 project references and enriched 116 existing records. The Anwar Landmark audit enumerated 103 official project pages; Edison Real Estate’s catalogue was reconciled to 73, Rancon FC to 29, and Equity’s currently exposed catalogue to eight.

Recovered 1,729 previously omitted media assets from retained official Navana and Sheltech snapshots and added 372 links through the new portfolio research. Removed 3,139 incorrectly attributed entries: Shanta related-project thumbnails and Assure icons/partner logos. Direct source dates remain visible; restoring an older asset does not make it newly published.

Scoring method 3.0 uses partial-criterion coverage, image/plan attribution, contextual review discounts and explicit uncertainty deductions. Scores do not certify legal title, approval or engineering safety.

Earlier portfolio audit — 20 September 2026

3280 development records and 40 resale references are now indexed. The earlier daily research run reconciled the Assure Group website while preserving its separately registered REHAB legal entities.

• The official phase catalogue ↗ returned 346 raw rows. Repeated rows were removed, leaving 282 distinct current project URLs: 107 ongoing, 41 upcoming and 134 completed.
• The official sitemap ↗ exposes 375 project links. Of these, 101 are absent from every current phase feed and remain status-unresolved—not current sale inventory.
• The 383-url union was consolidated into 355 published Assure records after same-name alias deduplication, adding 345 records. Two exact pages were inaccessible; their source references remain flagged rather than reconstructed.
• The original extraction recorded 3,744 facts and 571 facility claims. A subsequent attribution audit removed 2,814 Assure page icons and partner logos, including 172 icons incorrectly labelled as plans. The current dashboard above uses the corrected media set. No destination was labelled a verified 3D/360 tour.
• Two live paid Meta cards were safely matched to Assure Maple Leaf and Assure Victoria. Nine generic official cards remain developer-level and were not forced onto projects.

Identity and evidence caution: REHAB lists Assure Development And Design Ltd, Assure Builders Ltd. and Assurance Developments Ltd. separately. The group website does not identify the legal owner on every project page, so records remain brand-level. Complete social histories, verified prices, live units, named project salespeople and attributable project-level buyer reviews remain unavailable.